> DKIM is about domains, not email addresses. And that's all ADSP should be. > Using i= encourages this cofusion. Using "Author Signature" rather than > "Author > Domain Signature" also encourages it.
Indeed. As I recall, when we started this, both pre-IETF and bringing it into the IETF, one goal was to allow, in the architecture, extension to individual authors... but *not* to deal with individual authors at this stage. It was, in fact, one (of several) of the arguments about why we couldn't just use S/MIME. > If the domain owner cannot exert enough administrative control, to keep > signatures for mailing lists separate from signatures for authors, then that's > the owner's problem. It shouldn't be the receivers. I agree. Barry (participant) _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
