On Apr 2, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>> I think you may have put your finger on the root of much of the >> interpretation differences. It might in fact be a really good idea >> to replace the term "Author Signature" with the term "Author Domain >> Signature" throughout the ADSP spec to help address this. It seems >> >>> The specification and semantics of ADSP get simpler, cleaner and >>> properly >>> scoped, when d= is used. Using i= really does invite a complex of >>> issues that >>> should be outside the scope of DKIM and ADSP. >>> >>> Use d=. >> [> ] >> >> +1 > > I am all for this. > > +1 Agreed. Let's have a simple ADSP that minimizes the wiggle room available for confusion or complexity. After some real world experience, we can add complexity as needed. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
