Mark Delany wrote: > On Apr 2, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > >>> I think you may have put your finger on the root of much of the >>> interpretation differences. It might in fact be a really good idea >>> to replace the term "Author Signature" with the term "Author Domain >>> Signature" throughout the ADSP spec to help address this. It seems >>> > >>>> The specification and semantics of ADSP get simpler, cleaner and >>>> properly >>>> scoped, when d= is used. Using i= really does invite a complex of >>>> issues that >>>> should be outside the scope of DKIM and ADSP. >>>> >>>> Use d=. >>> [> ] >>> >>> +1 >> I am all for this. >> >> +1 > > Agreed. Let's have a simple ADSP that minimizes the wiggle room > available for confusion or complexity. After some real world > experience, we can add complexity as needed.
+1 -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc http://www.returnpath.net/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
