Siegel, Ellen wrote: > >>> I agree with Doug's point here. The problem is that the more I think >>> about it, the more I think it's a mistake for us to put MUA advice >>> into the standards-track documents, and I'm inclined, rather, to want >>> to remove what's there rather than to change it. >> +1 >> > +1
+1 I don't completely agree with John, though -- I think this group /could/ come up with a fairly sane set of recommendations for MUA developers who want to display information based on DKIM results, so long as we're careful to confine it to what the results mean to end recipients and not get into whether the buttons should be painted periwinkle or mauve -- but if we do, it has to be a separate informational document. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc http://www.returnpath.net/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
