J.D. Falk:
> Siegel, Ellen wrote:
> >
> >>> I agree with Doug's point here. The problem is that the more I think
> >>> about it, the more I think it's a mistake for us to put MUA advice
> >>> into the standards-track documents, and I'm inclined, rather, to want
> >>> to remove what's there rather than to change it.
> >> +1
> >>
> > +1
>
> +1
>
> I don't completely agree with John, though -- I think this group /could/
> come up with a fairly sane set of recommendations for MUA developers who
> want to display information based on DKIM results, so long as we're careful
> to confine it to what the results mean to end recipients and not get into
> whether the buttons should be painted periwinkle or mauve -- but if we do,
> it has to be a separate informational document.
+1
I agree with Doug/Ellen, and with JD except that our explanations
should target MUA developers, not recipients.
Wietse
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
