On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, J.D. Falk wrote: >>>> I agree with Doug's point here. The problem is that the more I think >>>> about it, the more I think it's a mistake for us to put MUA advice >>>> into the standards-track documents, and I'm inclined, rather, to want >>>> to remove what's there rather than to change it. >>> >>> +1 >> >> +1 > > +1 > > I don't completely agree with John, though -- I think this group /could/ > come up with a fairly sane set of recommendations for MUA developers who > want to display information based on DKIM results, so long as we're careful > to confine it to what the results mean to end recipients and not get into > whether the buttons should be painted periwinkle or mauve -- but if we do, > it has to be a separate informational document.
+1 to JD's view (remove it from ADSP, but don't rule that we're not competent to make informational recommendations). _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
