I'm certainly ready to move forward with 4871bis. Yes, the protocol is
ready to go to Draft Standard. No, we do not need another cycle at
Proposed Standard. I think there's enough energy in the group to get
4871bis through.
As to why bother, with 16 errata to pore through, I feel that it is much
better to have one place to look for the technical spec instead of 17
documents.
Tony
Barry Leiba wrote:
> This is the promised seed for 4871bis discussion. Is the group ready
> to move ahead with that? Is the DKIM signing protocol ready to go to
> Draft Standard? Is there an update needed, with another cycle at
> Proposed Standard? Is there energy in the group to follow a 4871bis
> effort through?
>
> Please discuss this here, with the goal of deciding -- within the next
> couple of weeks -- whether we should request a meeting slot in
> Stockholm.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
