>1. On whether to do rfc4871bis at all > >I tend to agree with Tony that we should do a -bis to clean up the >errata. If scoped as such it should be a very brief operation, taking >no more than 6 months.
Agreed, the world needs a description of DKIM and its warts in one place. >2. On whether to move to draft standard I wouldn't bother. It makes no difference in the outside world, so I'd rather direct our limited time to -bis. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
