John Levine wrote: > In article <[email protected]> you write:
>> On 10/09/2009 11:05 PM, John Levine wrote: >>> People who contribute to mailing lists shouldn't say dkim=all. We >>> argued this ad nauseam when we were hammering out ADSP, it shouldn't >>> come as a surprise to anyone. >> That is not true at all. They shouldn't be using discardable. "All" only >> says what the sender does, not what the receiver should expect. > > They certainly shouldn't be using discardable. I would advise not using > all either, due to the observed tendency of people to pay way too much > attention to DKIM and ADSP failures. So overall, you are in favor in deprecating RFC 5617? My position is now is to agree with you IFF the modus operandi is to allow for resigners with no mandate or recommendation to use RFC 5617. If this is the recommendation, then we need to get rid of it or fine tune the specification to spell out the issues with receivers who begin to support it. -- _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
