I'd say just deprecate ADSP. It has a niche application if at all and I dont foresee any kind of widespread deployment beyond in a few senders / ESPs.
That kind of technology doesnt need an RFC for it. On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:32 AM, hector <[email protected]> wrote: > John, > > You can't use STATISTICS - you must use protocol methodology - LOGIC. > > You can't tell the world RFC 5617 is available as a DKIM "Add-on" > technology YET support the intentional ignorance of its existence or > hope that no one will support it. > > You can't have it both ways. Either you will support RFC 5617 or you, > as the author of RFC 5617 propose to get rid of it. > > Either way, as a SMTP and LIST SERVER developer, it will at least give > us and in the general sense, all SMTP and LIST SERVER developers, a > protocol consistent methodology to increase DKIM adoption and unleash > it to our customers. > > -- > HLS _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
