On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:58:55 -0700 "Murray S. Kucherawy" <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of John Levine >> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 1:31 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] How about that DKIM charter update proposal >> >> Re the ADSP data collection, I'd like to add a third option to move it >> to Historic if ADSP turns out to be as useful as I think, but I >> realize this is unlikely to be a popular suggestion. > >How about "Experimental"? > Why is it more experimental now than when it was published?
>From the beginning, I have not had the impression that the policy piece of the charter has not been taken very seriously. Publishing All/Discardable does take some significant effort to make sure all of an entities MTAs are reliably signing. I think it's way premature to have an opinion about if it will get used or not. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
