Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I'd invite the people that have been involved in those conversations to state > specifically what areas draft-ietf-dkim-deployment could cover to close these > gaps. I seek one thing: Codify the semantics regarding ADSP implementation vs Forwarder DKIM implementation. If thats a problem, then ADSP needs to be pulled. We don't need evidence to show there is a problem but only engineering inference that there will be a problem if there is any growth in either part with a clear collision. -- HLS _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
