Eliot Lear wrote: > On 10/26/09 9:40 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: >> Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: [ . . . ] >>> If we don't want to change this document so late in its evolution, that's >>> fine; I'd be happy if it came out as a BCP document later, either from the >>> IETF or through a body like MAAWG. >>> >> Separate BCP on details on usage: +1 [ . . . ] > +1, but a forward reference of some sort, like "a separate work is > planned on this topic" wouldn't be out of order.
+1 to both the BCP and the forward reference. -- J.D. Falk Return Path Inc http://www.returnpath.net/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
