>> I think "dormant" will work, if this is the route we decide to take. >> But I think we won't be completely dormant, anyway, if we're gathering >> data and reviewing the informational documents, and perhaps updating >> them. > > I think it would be nice if we had (if already done, reestablish) a > foundation for what exactly we are looking for during this "dormant" > period.
Agreed. > - Personal Community/Network (AKA Local Sites) Statistics? > - Growth of Incoming Signed Messages > - Percentage of Spam > - Percentage of 1st, 3rd party > - Percentage of failed hashing from EyeBalled Good guys. > - Growth of ADSP domains > - Growth of Open Standard Reputations Systems > - Growth of Open API Commercial Reputations Systems > - Exclusivity Analysis (What If) > - What if your other current filters (i.e. SPF) > was not around? > - What if Remailers honored ADSP? > - FOG (Flash Of Genius) protocol fitting solutions > > etc, some form of foundation for producing a formal report after 1+ > years or at some group agreed date. That sounds like a good set to start discussion with. And, yes, I like the idea of having a report on the work-item list. Barry, as participant _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
