On 2/23/2010 2:24 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
> It seems a .forward or other techniques could break the signature. This could
> be alleviated by recommending which headers should be signed or not.
Per the relevant discussion in the email architecture document:
<http://bbiw.net/specifications/rfc5598-email-arch.html#rfc.section.5.1>
most forwarding as an aliasing function is not likely to break a DKIM sig.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
