OK, dates: > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba > Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 11:32 AM > To: IETF DKIM WG > Subject: [ietf-dkim] Proposed new charter > > [...] > +++ New Work +++ > The working group is now ready to switch its focus to refining and > advancing the DKIM protocols. The current deliverables for the > DKIM working group are these: > > 1. Advance the base DKIM protocol (RFC 4871) to Draft Standard. > This is the first priority for the working group.
Unfortunately I don't have any background doing this kind of work, so I'm forced to guess. But what about the July IETF as a "done-by" date? Is that a crazy idea? > 2. Collect data on the deployment, interoperability, and > effectiveness of the base DKIM protocol, with consideration > toward updating the working group's informational documents. July IETF. > 3. Collect data on the deployment, interoperability, and > effectiveness of the Author Domain Signing Practices protocol > (RFC 5617), and determine if/when it's ready to advance on the > standards track. Update it at Proposed Standard, advance it to > Draft Standard, deprecate it, or determine another disposition, > as appropriate. November IETF. > 4. Taking into account the data collected in (2) and (3), update > the overview and deployment/operations documents. These are > considered living documents, and should be updated periodically, > as we have more real-world experience. February 2011 IETF. > 5. Consider issues related to mailing lists, beyond what is > already documented. This includes considerations for mailing > list software that supports or intends to support DKIM, as well > as considerations for DKIM/ADSP deployment in the presence of > mailing lists that do not have such support. Include > recommendations in the informational documents, or produce a > new informational document about mailing-list considerations. I think this can be done in parallel, so November IETF. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
