in theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. in practice, there's interoperability testing...
d/ On 3/2/2010 5:00 AM, John Levine wrote: >> Do we know whether DKIM works IDNs? If not, what should we do about >> that? >> (I'm sitting in Apricot and this came up during an APCauce discussion.) > > IDNs are all punycoded as xn--whatever and turn into normal domain > names. Nothing exotic there. > > If people want to put un-punycoded UTF into their domain names, it > won't work very well for DKIM, but then it wouldn't work any better > for anything else. > > R's, > John > -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
