> in theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. > in practice, there's interoperability testing...
I'd think more conformance than interop, since I'd be surprised if there were any ambiguity about the correct way to encode UTF-8 into punycode. >>> Do we know whether DKIM works IDNs? If not, what should we do about >>> that? >>> (I'm sitting in Apricot and this came up during an APCauce discussion.) >> >> IDNs are all punycoded as xn--whatever and turn into normal domain >> names. Nothing exotic there. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
