> -----Original Message----- > From: McDowell, Brett [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 9:51 AM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available > > I'm an IETF newbie, so correct me if I'm wrong. But it seems you are > only asking the binary question of whether the WG is willing to add > this deliverable to it's scope, with your draft as a strawman, and you > acting as the editor. You are not asking us if we have rough consensus > on the contents of the document in its current form. Correct?
Yes, that's right. (And I'm not sure you meant "strawman" so much as "skeleton"...) > From what I see on the list, there is clear consensus that this > document should be produced as a WG document (which I support as well). > So can we consider that question closed? That's up to the chairs, but I suspect we have enough agreement to move forward. There is the incomplete matter of re-chartering though. > Now that it's a WG document, what's the review process... do we just > chime in with comments and suggested edits on this thread? Once it's official, I'll go back and plow through the huge recent threads about DKIM and lists and try to distill things the document needs, as well as soliciting feedback explicitly. You're welcome to start commenting right away if you like. (Everybody else has!) -MSK _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
