On 05/11/2010 06:10 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> From what I see on the list, there is clear consensus that this >> document should be produced as a WG document (which I support as well). >> So can we consider that question closed? > > That's up to the chairs, but I suspect we have enough agreement to move > forward. Agreed. > There is the incomplete matter of re-chartering though. Right. Doing that now. Stephen. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
