On 05/19/2010 02:21 PM, J.D. Falk wrote: > On May 19, 2010, at 7:53 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > >> +1. The current discussion was supposed to be about BCP. I agree with >> Stephen with the caveat that if the group thinks re-opening ADSP >> discussion is important then include it in the re-charter. Personally >> I'd like to wait until we hear some numbers about ADSP deployment and >> experience. > > +1
Doesn't that sort of undermine the impetus to do a BCP on lists? Most of the sticky questions about lists are intertwined with ADSP, as evidenced by the recent messages here from paypal folks. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
