> -----Original Message----- > From: John Levine [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 2:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: MH Michael Hammer (5304) > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available > > >From my perspective, it would have to be very compelling for me to > >support modifying ADSP at this point. ADSP is the DKIM tail and not > >vice a versa. > > Entirely agreed. As this point the only concrete datum I'm aware of > is that ADSP has been observed to break IETF mailing lists. I would > want to see a lot more practical as opposed to hypothetical experience > before offering further advice. >
That's ironic, I heard it the other way around.... that many mailing lists break DKIM signatures and thus ADSP..... go figure <G>. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
