On May 20, 2010, at 10:09 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > If Brett or anyone else has data points that would impact the decision > as to whether the group sticks to a Lists BCP discussion based on > current practice/implementations or sets that aside to modify ADSP, now > is the time to present it.
A) I hear you and I'm working on making some confidential data publicly available for the first time. It's more than a notion to achieve, but I'm working on it. But if folks don't trust my anecdotal evidence/use case, why would they trust my data? B) I'm going to re-subscribe to this (and all outside-the-firewall mailing lists) with a personal email address to avoid the current situation (of my messages going to SPAM or the bit bucket due to the firm ADSP=discardable policy on paypal.com and MLM's inability to sustain DKIM signatures in a form receivers need to see it in order to verify the paypal.com signature). It's a temporary work-around and we are developing a long-term solution for our employees that I'll write about once it's live so other ADSP=discardable organization can learn from our experience. C) I don't know if this list is the right place to discuss updating/expanding ADSP, but it is absolutely related and important in the big picture. That said, I agree the BCP for MLM's is separate and needs to be published for the world as it is today, or it won't be published for quite some time. -- Brett _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
