On 05/19/2010 11:25 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > Attending a Maastricht meeting is highly likely for me, but Beijing is less > certain.
You may not be alone there. > Could we plan a regular meeting in Maastricht? Seems appropriate given the > big interest in a "DKIM And MLMs" document. Sure. Assuming there's sufficient interest. Please let Barry and I know (or the list, whatever) what you think is better. Separately, some IESG folks have asked whether we really have the cycles available for some of our new charter items, in particular: - Dec 2010 - WG last call on an I-D detailing deployment and effectiveness data for DKIM base - Dec 2010 - WG last call on an I-D detailing deployment and effectiveness data for ADSP - Mar 2011 - Update overview and deployment informational RFCs as appropriate, and/or produce one or more new informational RFCs from information obtained above So, if you're interested and have time to do good reviews or help with editing please do let Barry and I know in the next day or two and we'll summarise back to the list. Thanks, Stephen. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
