On 5/22/2010 2:09 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > On 05/21/2010 03:45 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: >> On 5/20/2010 3:36 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: >>> Separately, some IESG folks have asked whether we really have the cycles >>> available for some of our new charter items, in particular: >> >> I don't understand their concern. >> >> What do they mean and what is the basis for their concern? > > I really can't think of more than one reason for asking, which is the totally > obvious one: "is there enough interest to do the work planned."
The form of the question is quite common elsewhere, though I don't remember hearing it from the IESG before. Normally it is a question about capacity, not interest. In other words, are we too busy to add this task? That's why I asked. If they mean what you guess, it's an odd way to ask it. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
