Hi Stephen, At 03:36 20-05-10, Stephen Farrell wrote: >Sure. Assuming there's sufficient interest. Please let Barry and I >know (or the list, whatever) what you think is better.
I'm interested in working on the "DKIM and MLMs" document. I am in favor of meeting at the next IETF as there will be more WG participants there than at the last meeting of the year. >Separately, some IESG folks have asked whether we really have >the cycles available for some of our new charter items, in >particular: > >- Dec 2010 - WG last call on an I-D detailing deployment and >effectiveness data for DKIM base >- Dec 2010 - WG last call on an I-D detailing deployment and >effectiveness data for ADSP >- Mar 2011 - Update overview and deployment informational RFCs as >appropriate, and/or produce one or more new informational RFCs from >information obtained above I'll read the documents. If other WG participants have the cycles, I'll make time for the above. Regards, -sm _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
