On 25/05/2010 18:37, Ian Eiloart wrote: > No, and of course a site needn't reject ADSP mail with broken signatures. > Indeed, to protect it's members from unwanted unsubscriptions, it might be > better to drop the email than reject it. But, then the sender might never > discover what they're doing wrong.
Worse, such a configuration would do collateral damage: other "broken ADSP" cases (forwarders which aren't mailing-lists in the sense that we're describing) would lead to silent message loss. > If the recipient rejects the message, > then the list should be able to bounce back to the sender, since it was > originally properly signed. > Ideally, but without a reliable indication by the receiver that the refusal was for DKIM failure, there's no easy way for the MLM to know which bounces to return to the sender. - Roland -- Roland Turner | Director, Professional Services Group BoxSentry Pte Ltd | 3 Phillip Street #13-03, Singapore 048693 Mobile: +65 96700022 | Skype: roland.turner [email protected] | http://www.boxsentry.com/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
