On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> wrote: > (I might have the "5.7.1" wrong, but you get the idea.)
Ah, my type of tangent. I think 5.7.1 is right. Ideally, in the future, it would be a 5.8.z. But before even that, we need more folks to support RFC3463. -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
