> -----Original Message----- > From: SM [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:06 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Michael Thomas; Murray S. Kucherawy > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] bad mail blowback > > At 07:53 27-05-10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > >I think it's appropriate since ADSP is creating the problem (or in > >your view, extending the existing problem). > > Maybe, but this is the kind of thing where some people will take the > simplistic answer and ignore the caveats.
True, but that doesn't mean it's not worth saying. I'd rather say it to what limited audience this draft might have than not say it at all. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
