--On 26 May 2010 11:48:53 -0700 Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Perhaps I'm missing something. I'm working with the mental model >> that the underlying problem ADSP advocates would like to address >> is phishing or brand protection, as they're the only concrete problems >> I've seen mentioned. > > So you're on a tangent about something that's not even vaguely in our > charter. ADSP doesn't claim to solve "phishing", it just allows > bit-for-bit domain names to be safely tossed if they don't have a > signature. How that integrates into the larger anti-phishing modules is > frankly where the secret sauce lies for vendors. Addressing an issue and solving it aren't the same things. Heck, neither is even a prerequisite for the other, given that some problems are self-resolving or solved accidentally. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
