> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas > Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 3:07 PM > To: Steve Atkins > Cc: DKIM List > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong > Discussion > > On 06/02/2010 11:41 AM, Steve Atkins wrote: > > Fourth, as I mentioned above, even if all you said was valid, > registering thousands of domains in order to make ADSP sort-of work > against phishing isn't something that scales, either in terms of domain > name system nor the expense. If ADSP requires users to spend tend of > thousands of dollars a year to maintain domain registrations in order for > it to have a significant effect on phishing then it's not something that's > really going to scale to more than a handful of senders. > > I'd be willing to bet a good chunk of money that Paypay -- and lots of > other domains -- > have this practice regardless, and preceding ADSP. ADSP use supplements > that current > best practice for phishing target domains. Which is sort of the point. > > Mike >
Thousands of domains registered and counting. Been doing it well before ADSP and view it as only one of the things that owners of abused domains do. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
