On May 28, 2010, at 12:14 AM, John Levine wrote: >> So I understand your line of reasoning. But today, I believe ADSP can >> provide a benefit. Brett has data that supports that. > > Once again, we have a pernicious confusion between manually maintained > drop lists and ADSP. > > Brett has data that supports the former, not the latter.
I disagree, but here's some new data that might better illustrate the case for ADSP. In terms of public information, we are in production with DKIM verification/blocking today with two mailbox providers. We'd like to be in production with say... two hundred by some near-term date certain. Hence the need for ADSP. The case is even stronger from the mailbox providers' perspective since they would be working with orders of magnitude more senders. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
