>+1. OpenDKIM actually implements a reject (55x error) with the >intent of giving the sender/victim an opportunity to detect a >problem, an idea for which there is some obvious demand, though I >imagine we should make that configurable and maybe even default it to >an actual accept-but-throw-away form of "discard".
That seems reasonable to me, but keep in mind that's the exact behavior that got people bounced off an IETF list when an unrelated domain marked its users' mail as discardable. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
