--On 25 June 2010 16:21:00 -0400 "John R. Levine" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I don't recollect you proposing wording that included "silently" so it >> isn't even possible for a person going back and look at the discussions >> to know what you meant. >> >> We are therefore left with what you wrote and which the working group >> came to a consensus on. > > Whatever. I find it hard to see how anyone could interpret the RFC and > the discussion leading up to it as a hidden consensus to send spam every > time a receiver saw "dkim=discardable", but I'm clearly not going to > persuade you otherwise. It's nothing of the sort. The question isn't whether one SHOULD notify the recipient, but whether one MAY do so. > R's, > John > _______________________________________________ > NOTE WELL: This list operates according to > http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
