>This assumes mail from MLMs is treated differently than other mail. >While individual users may (and probably do) treat it differently, >receivers of non- trivial scale don't and can't.
Sigh. Anyone who uses gmail would know that your assertion is just plain wrong. And in any event, even if your assertion were true, so what? Our working assumption is that receivers will use valid DKIM signatures to whitelist mail from signers they like. How does it matter whether the signer happened to be a related to a list? R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
