On Monday, August 09, 2010 06:52:04 pm Steve Atkins wrote: > On Aug 9, 2010, at 3:13 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > This assumes mail from MLMs is treated differently than other mail. > > While individual users may (and probably do) treat it differently, > > receivers of non- trivial scale don't and can't. > > I agree, in general. > > One implication of that is that if you're planning to do something with > email that will break if there's a MLM involved, it's broken[1]. > > Cheers, > Steve > > [1] We could call this "The SRS lemma".
Yes. It's very similar. One needs to decide what factors one cares about the most. I said a few threads ago that I don't think there is a completely satisfactory solution. I think the possibilities are roughly: 1. Fix lists so that signatures survive. 2. Have MLMs change the domain of the message. 3. Have mail get rejected/discarded/etc. There are variants of all three possibilities, but none that will satisfy everyone. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
