On Aug 9, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, August 09, 2010 06:52:04 pm Steve Atkins wrote: >> >> One implication of that is that if you're planning to do something with >> email that will break if there's a MLM involved, it's broken[1]. >> >> Cheers, >> Steve >> >> [1] We could call this "The SRS lemma". > > Yes. It's very similar. > > One needs to decide what factors one cares about the most. I said a few > threads ago that I don't think there is a completely satisfactory solution. > I > think the possibilities are roughly: > > 1. Fix lists so that signatures survive. > > 2. Have MLMs change the domain of the message. > > 3. Have mail get rejected/discarded/etc.
4. Write off ADSP as broken, do something useful instead. (Just for completeness). > > There are variants of all three possibilities, but none that will satisfy > everyone. Yup. Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
