Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > If you advocate for a general MLM BCP, this will be a non-WG document > (it's outside of our charter) so I'd love to get some MLM operators > and developers involved. (Maybe this should take place on ietf-822 > or maybe on a new non-WG list; suggestions welcome.) Expressions > of interest in that work would be appreciated. I'll approach the > APPS ADs about a venue.
The DKIM WG charter includes LIST operations support. 5. Consider issues related to mailing lists, beyond what is already documented. This includes considerations for mailing list software that supports or intends to support DKIM, as well as considerations for DKIM/ADSP deployment in the presence of mailing lists that do not have such support. Include recommendations in the informational documents, or produce a new informational document about mailing-list considerations. Therefore your MLM would be very appropriate. Mr. Crocker says this is a distracting from "our current work." Mr. Crocker should be reminded what is out of scope per the charter: * Reputation and accreditation systems. While we expect these to add value to what is defined by the DKIM working group, their development will be separate, and is out of scope for the DKIM working group. The on-going changes in the DKIM draft standard documentations and specification semantics all related to reputation has been a major distraction, hindrance and road block in completed chartered goals. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
