On Tuesday 31 August 2010 04:03:45 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > I'd like some help tackling the next version of the MLM draft. People seem > to have varying ideas about what should be removed and perhaps appear in > other documents now. I need some consensus on a direction in which to > proceed. > > So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following: > > (1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that discusses > signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no value-add items > addressed, a DKIM MLM Informational that discusses possible value-add > enhancements to MLMs in the DKIM world, and a non-WG BCP about mailing > lists irrespective of DKIM (Dave's proposal);
-1. A single document is good for implementors. > (2) Tear out everything having to do with making author signatures survive > list relaying, dropping all that text altogether, and instead pointing > people at S/MIME or PGP (John's proposal); -1. Surviving signatures seems like a good long term goal. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
