> -----Original Message----- > From: Hector Santos [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:00 PM > To: Murray S. Kucherawy > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposed changes to MLM draft > > I truly hope your are not force to split your document that minimizes > the need for Mailing List Software developers to correctly engineer > their products without producing erroneous DKIM signatures problems > for members.
I don't see how the proposed document split minimizes anything. There's a legitimate question of whether or not we should try to compel MLM developers to write their code to preserve author signatures. We can debate that question, but if in the end consensus says it's not a useful goal then we shouldn't bother producing text that says it is. That's a separate issue from the list signing traffic that goes through it irrespective of author signatures. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
