> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of John R. Levine > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 8:14 AM > To: McDowell, Brett > Cc: DKIM > Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review > > > I agree with Mike's assessment. > > I remain unable to reconcile "this is very important" and "throw it > away" applied to the same message.
I don't think ADSP "discardable" means simply "throw it away" because it leaves out the "ifs" that are supposed to be in front of it. That simplified interpretation presupposes the message will pretty much always arrive signed but not verifiable, meaning you basically don't believe DKIM can be trusted to work. How about: "It is important to us that this arrive at your inbox signed by us and unmodified. You should not keep it if that is not the case." ...which is how I read the RFC. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
