SM wrote: > Hi Murray, > At 09:52 14-09-10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> How about: "It is important to us that this arrive at your inbox >> signed by us and unmodified. You should not keep it if that is not the >> case." >> >> ...which is how I read the RFC. > > From Section 4.2.1 of RFC 5617: > > "All mail from the domain is signed with an > Author Domain Signature. Furthermore, if a > message arrives without a valid Author Domain > Signature due to modification in transit, > submission via a path without access to a > signing key, or any other reason, the domain > encourages the recipient(s) to discard it." > > As a receiver, I read this as the sender encouraging me to discard > the message if it is not DKIM verified. From previous discussions on > this mailing list, it seems that the arguement was about reducing the > amount of bounces.
Small nit: "as the AUTHOR DOMAIN encouraging me to discard ....." -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
