On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > I don't think ADSP "discardable" means simply "throw it away" because it > leaves out the "ifs" that are supposed to be in front of it. That simplified > interpretation presupposes the message will pretty much always arrive signed > but not verifiable, meaning you basically don't believe DKIM can be trusted > to work. > > How about: "It is important to us that this arrive at your inbox signed by us > and unmodified. You should not keep it if that is not the case." > > ...which is how I read the RFC.
And what the proponents intended when we wrote it. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
