(sorry Stephen, but I had to reply to this one) On Sep 15, 2010, at 12:01 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>> That seems aligned with Steve's point about DKIM's value coming (only?) when >> the d= value is not the same as the domain-name in the from: field. So >> according to you (and Steve?) the IETF should pass a normative requirement >> that all verified email be hired out to 3rd parties?! That strikes me as >> very anti-Internet. > > I think you're not reading carefully, and you're twisting Jeff's words and > mine to a point that bears no resemblance to what either of us said. As it turns out, you are completely correct and I withdraw that comment. It just shows how entirely confused I was about what you and Jeff meant by 3rd-party signatures (which Jeff clarified in his response). Jeff's definition of 3rd-party signature is entirely different from what I thought it meant (and what other experts have responded to me with off-list BTW). I've taken this conversation off-list. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
