Hi J.D.,
What an interesting conversation you've stoked!
On 9/14/10 9:35 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:
> ...but not for the reasons the anti-ADSP folks keep bringing up.
>
> DKIM is failing because every discussion about actually /using/ DKIM
> inevitably gets stuck in the same old argument about ADSP. Doesn't even
> matter what the argument is about anymore; it stops all forward progress
> every time. And we keep letting it happen -- actively participating, even,
> including me.
>
> Continuing to argue these same points over and over is disrespectful of our
> colleagues both on and off this list, and of the IETF process.
Without getting all emotional about all of this, I would think first
things first. If we could sort the identification of the {user domain
entry point or enterprise root/top level or whatever you want to call
that thing above .ac.uk or .com or sf.ca.us} domain, and it is something
that we would like to have, then that will offer us a number of
interesting opportunities. Thanks to Dave Crocker for not letting that
one go. It's work that needs doing, albeit perhaps not here, even
though we may benefit. FWIW I have some thoughts as to how this might
go, if some people are interested. I will *not* be in Beijing to
discuss them, but would be happy to do so if folks want to hear about them.
Eliot
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
