There was very little response to my last straw poll about where we go with the MLM draft next. It certainly wasn't enough to be able to claim "rough consensus" from a group this size.
I have some feedback on the actual text from Jeff, Daniel and Dave to incorporate, and I haven't forgotten that. But there remains the issue of whether or not to split it into two or three documents covering specific topics (a non-DKIM MLM BCP, a DKIM-specific MLM BCP, and a DKIM value-add for MLMs informational), and whether or not to just drop the whole affair because there's not enough we can really say anyway. Given my druthers I'd like to proceed with it the way it is since absent rough consensus to change course, the right thing to do seems to be to press on. (After thinking about that a bit, I have to admit that it's also the most attractive to me since it's the least amount of work...) Is anybody going to be really upset if I go that route and then work toward a WGLC later this year? -MSK _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
