On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:29 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:ietf-dkim- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald >> So the exchange is more likely to be: >> >> 1) message sent with restrictive policies >> 2) message bounces/is discarded >> 3) recipient feels unloved, asks Author why? >> 4) Author looks at logs and sees message was delivered, asks recipient >> to ask their ISP why >> 5) recipient asks ISP why >> 6) recipient gets an answer from ISP (really?) >> >> > > Jeff, > > Are you telling us that your clients are sending mail through your systems > using ADSP=discardable? If not, what are the restrictive policies indicated > in item "1)"?
Sorry, that was a generalization. I don't see us promoting ADSP. We are not doing DKIM yet (about to pilot any week now). I just wrote some documentation for client services in which I left out ADSP on purpose. Although I do feel that ADSP is fine for marketing domains, I suspect that our clients want all their messages delivered. However, we do strict SPF/SenderID. Simply because of mandates by certain groups or ISPs. And we'll publish ADSP records for clients who ask for it. > For item "3)", can you indicate generally the nature of the mails involved? > Are these transactional? marketing? Where's the love? Both. Believe it or not, some people live for bargains and haven't discovered what a RSS reader can provide. > Just trying to understand. #1 could be shortened to "message sent" and the rest would still be true. -- Jeff Macdonald Ayer, MA _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
