Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>> But to be conformant, I suppose 550 5.7.0 would be appropriate.
>> Alessandro Replied:
>> Conformant to what?
> RFC5321, as cited.
See section 4.3.2
DATA
I: 354 -> data -> S: 250
E: 552, 554, 451, 452
E: 451, 554, 503
I don't see 550 there.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
