Hector Santos wrote:
> Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>
>>>> But to be conformant, I suppose 550 5.7.0 would be appropriate.
>
>>> Alessandro Replied:
>>> Conformant to what?
>
>> RFC5321, as cited.
>
> See section 4.3.2
>
> DATA
> I: 354 -> data -> S: 250
> E: 552, 554, 451, 452
> E: 451, 554, 503
>
> I don't see 550 there.
Correction, I was looking at 2821. 5321 updated it to:
DATA
I: 354 -> data -> S: 250
E: 552, 554, 451, 452
E: 450, 550 (rejections for policy reasons)
E: 503, 554
550 would be correct for update software.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
