> What about option 4, "information publishers who don't like interference
> by transport providers use TLS/SSL to enforce actual end-to-end
> transmission of the content" ? As we gain experience in implementing
> TLS, this is a certainly a possibility!

so we increase the burden on publishers who want content integrity in the
name of decreasing the burden on intermediaries who want to corrupt content?

somehow that doesn't seem like a socially beneficial tradeoff.

Keith

Reply via email to